Appeal Three To Mr. Arvind Kejriwal

16.03.2014     
There are several prominent ,reputed and popular political leaders of various political parties in India who have reportedly performed better when elected to power. Some are good in the eyes of some people and some are bad in the eyes of some other people. None of them are not so good that every men of their area like. Even the best persons have opponents. Even Arvind Kejriwal cannot claim to be a person who is liked by one and all.

I submit hereunder name of some of these popular figures:--

1. Sonia Gandhi
2. Rahul Gandhi
3. Kapil sibbal
4. P Chidambram
5. L K Advani
6. Narendra Modi
7. Sushma Swaraj
8. Arun Jaitley
9. Rajnath Singh
10. Mulayam singh Yadav
11. Akhilesh Pd Yadav
12. Nitish KumaR
13. Lalu Prasad Yadav
14. Naveen Patnaik
15. Mamta banerjee
16. Mayawati
17. Jayalalitha
18. Karunanidhi
19. Farooq Abdullah
20. Shivraj Singh chouhan
21. Raman Singh
22. Manohar Parikar
23. Prakash Karat
24. Prakash singh Badal
25. Arvind Kejriwal
26. Manish Sisodia
27. Kumar Biswas

    And so on..........

I request Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and his supporters to assess and ascertain ability and capacity of above named and other popular figures of various parties to decide whether they have potential to lead this country. He may give them marks  from various angles and come to conclusion only after giving them a balanced consideration and balanced ,practical and pragmatic approach . They should assess whether these people are performing in their command area and if performing who are those who get more than 60 marks out of 100.If some of them have not performed in the past but they can perform better if given fresh opportunity, then also marks can be given.

Similarly AK and AAP should assess and ascertain the ability of their candidates honestly and find out the names who are able to get  more than 60 marks applying same criteria and same parameters as applied for others.They should at least  not put candidate against good persons.

Lastly I request AK. AAP and all who want progress of the country and who want improvement in living standard of common men to ensure  entry of all good persons in Parliament irrespective of their party affiliation. Only good people can ensure justice to common men and not a few of any particular party. None of political entity including even AAP is ideally full of best stalwarts and best performers. Similarly none of prominent and popular leaders named above can say honestly that they are loved by all Indians uniformly and without any doubt.

Every elected member , almost every MP or MLA is liked by at most 40 percent voters whereas he or she is disliked by 60 percent of voters.Democratic principles and policies always give value to best possible option and not cry or aspire  for ideally 100 percent perfect person. Arvind Kejriwal and his party AAP blame every Tom Dick and Herry of other parties and call every politiicans of other parties and every businessmen as corrupt but do not introspect and accept the shortcomings and black spot of his own men and women.

Bitter truth is that none of political party (other than BJP) can be expected to get absolute majority in 2014 Parliament. In such critical situation, all leaders have to ponder over how to form government keeping in view all conflicts and past controversies. 

Delhi state government can be kept in suspended animation after the resignation of Arvind Kejriwal but Indian Parliament cannot be kept in suspended animation and hence even if none of parties get absolute majority , it is necessary to form the government at center to keep India safe and progressive, economically, politically and socially. 

Mr. Arvind Kejriwal who promised to give a better system to Nation has now deviated from his promised agenda and has completely  focused his fight against Narendra Modi only to fulfill his ambition of becoming PM of the country.He wants to keep Modi away from power whereas he knows very well that his party will not get even 20 seats in Parliament. I fully condemn his "Dog in the Monger Policy" and suggest him to make effort that all good persons irrespective of party affiliation are elected and sent to Parliament so that they jointly may put the matter in right spirit and debate on any issue rightly and effectively.

As such it is desirable that all good among the worst are elected and sent to Parliament and all should learn to respect the views of others. Democracy also suggests debate and discussion for arriving at best possible solution for any particular problem.

Arvind Kejriwal is planning to fight against Narendra Modi in Varanasi or Kumar Biswas is planning to fight against Rahul Gandhi. How far the idea of Arvind Kejriwal is good and how far it is bad , I do not want to say. But I definitely would like to say that If Kejriwal and Modi both are good and better than many others , both of them should be elected. Similarly if Biswas and Rahul both are good, both should be elected to power.Parliament will be fortunate to have Kejriwal , Modi , Biswas and Rahul like persons in Parliament so that real fight for justice will take place in Parliament.

Arvind Kejriwal had promised and planned to give ticket to that person only who have been unanimously picked up by people of that very constituency and who is the best available option in that particular constituency. But unfortunately Arvind has also become victim of power politics of other parties and he has also started deciding allocation of tickets for election sitting in his personal or office room and has started taking decision on the basis of advice of a pool of four or five persons. He has also started exporting and importing candidates to and from other areas keeping in view winnability and financial capacity of aspiring candidate as old parties have been traditionally doing.

I am unable to understand how a person of Amritsar can serve in Ranchi in best way or a person of Delhi can serve in Amethi or a person of Gaziabad can serve in Varanasi. 

Unfortunately ,Political parties in general are acting as if they have to win IPL match by hook or by crook and then loot the country sacrificing the interest of common men and the country as a whole. Politicians in general are opting for politics not to serve the area people but only to earn money. It is very much unfortunate that they do not care future of India and do they like to serve people.

People of India had large expectation from newly borne AAP but it is painful that they are running from pillar to past to eliminate persons of other parties irrespective of whether the person is good or bad.

I once again request Mr. Arvind kejriwal not to make an environment of negativity and do not stop and do not disturb all good persons in performing. 

After all we have to choose figure among ciphers. Arvind Kejriwal cannot bring ideally honest and best performers from Mars or any other planet.

Arvind Kejriwal says that Mr. Narendra Modi has done nothing for Gujarat and progress and growth claimed to have taken place in Gujarat by media men or by BJP supporters is totally false. He says that media men are willfully not exposing Modi to serve their vested interest. He says that Raman has done nothing in Chhatishgarh,CM of goa has done nothing , Shiela Dixit has done nothing in Delhi or Nitish Kumar has done nothing in Bihar. He does not like Mamta, Mayawati or Jayalalitha . May be he is true.

But he should name at least names of a few states where the government has done some good work. He should name persons who have served better in their constituencies.

If Arvind learn to praise good persons he will get success in creating a positive environment. 

He should also keep in mind the difficulties in running a government in Delhi which forced him to resign. He should keep in mind how his own supporters became his rivals. He should keep in mind how people are fighting against each other in quest of a party ticket. He must apply his short tenure experience to make better future of the country and better future of people of India. He cannot claim to be 100 percent best for his men and cannot expect that his men (AAP men) will only perform and others will not.

I hope Mr. Arvind Kejriwal ponder over my views expressed above and try to change himself to change India. I do not hesitate in saying that India has already suffered a lot due to negativity of media men and that of AAP and there is no doubt that prolonged negativity will further damage India's financials.

Corruption is dangerous and concern for corruption or fight against corruption is equally dangerous and harmful for health of common men and the country. Action against corrupt is necessary but only to threaten action against all every time has adversely affected the work culture and sharply dampened the confidence of Foreign Investors as well as that of domestic investors. Willingly or unwillingly ,Growth has become victim of fight against corruption and I hope Arvind will learn lesson from deteriorating economic condition of the country.

           Last but not the least , Arvind Kejriwal had promised to select candidate from grass root level and will never impose a candidate from his office for any constituency and will not import candidate from other area. But unfortunately he has also started dirty politics and dirty tradition of other parties to impose and import candidate as per their whims and fancies or as per financial capacity or winnability.

If Arvind Kejriwal belongs to Delhi why has he chosen to file his nomination from Varanasi?

Is he afraid of victory in Delhi because he resigned from CM post in Delhi?

Does he not consider giving ticket to an outsider is another form of corruption in disguise?

Why has he totally discarded his effort against corruption and price rise and concentrated on removal of Mr. Modi ?

Why he is failing to stop infighting in his own party for ticket ? 

When he is unable to control his house , how will he control country like India?

He is no more in a position to preach sermons to other parties because he has started following dirty traditions of old parties.

As a matter of fact, none is ideally good and fully bad. Neither Arvind Kejriwal nor Modi nor Rahul are ideally perfect and choice of all voters. We have to choose best among available options only.

If Kejriwal is defeated in Varansai , country will lose a good candidate who can protest reign of injustice. On the other hand if Mr. Modi is defeated, country will lose an experienced leader who has vast experience of ruling.

16th March 2014

India Against corruption expresses views on Aam Admi Party on Facebook on 5th Of April 2014

India Against Corruption

9 hrs · 

AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal has left the country choiceless: Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

If the AAP government had fallen because of its positive action against corruption, it would have scored high on integrity. But the party was ill-advised to resign so that it could get out of Delhi and sweep the nation.

By doing this, Kejriwal showed himself to be no different from other politicians — the hidden ambition and agenda came to the forefront.

Cheap publicity stunts, self-contradiction, over-ambition and autocracy tarnished the positive image of AAP and soon many respectable people became disillusioned and left the party.

Now Kejriwal says that he is okay with a fractured mandate in this election and mid-term polls in two years’ time. This indicates a very callous attitude towards the nation’s economy and security.

He visited Gujarat for four days and hurled criticism without any basis at the state’s development. I have travelled through the length and breadth of Gujarat over the years. In the 1990s and early 2000s, to see a tree in Saurashtra was a rarity.

It was so drought-prone that people had to sell their cattle often. But today there is greenery everywhere. Electricity supply was scarce — hardly two hours a day. Today there is water and electricity in almost every village and the per capita income has risen.

While Gujarat may not be 100% corruption-free, I have no hesitation in saying that it is much better than what it used to be. Instead of being honest with facts, Kejriwal has chosen to put down BJP’s prime ministerial candidate and Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi on flimsy grounds.

If AAP is voted for a role in national politics and if Kejriwal does what he did in Delhi, it will be an absolute disaster for the country.

India cannot afford to take such a risk when the country is on a ventilator with most economic parameters vulnerably placed. We need a stable government at the Centre to put our economy back on track and spur development.

In a hurry to jump on the national scene, AAP has compromised all principles that gave birth to it.