Today on 4th March 2015 ,Arvind Kejriwal has again committed blunder by absconding from crucial meeting . He should have attended meeting and tried to persuade party members to shed personal sentiments , forget what happened, forgive each other and pledge to work together .
But unfortunately on the plea of sickness due to cough and cold , Mr. Kejriwal thought it wise to abstain from party meeting and leave the fate on the mercy of GOD
It is very much unfortunate and needs to be condemned by all.
Mr. Kejriwal is the maker and guardian of AAP and it was his duty to bring about reconciliation in warring factions of the party to save the image of the party. Now irreparable damage has occurred to the party and there is no doubt that the removal of Mr Yadav is the beginning of the end of the party.
It is sad that Mr. Yogendra Yadav is the most gentle and the most sincere person who helped in formation , promotion and victory of the party. Punishing a god person without any valid reason will have disastrous outcome for the party .
People of Delhi will laugh at childish act of AAPians. It is Delhites who are very much disappointed and stands cheated in the hands of AAPians.
It indicates that there is complete absence of maturity and wisdom in running a party which was voted to power just a few days ago by voters of Delhi.If makers of the party are unable to keep the party intact, how will they be able to keep voters of Delhi happy and comfortable.
AAP crisis: Kejriwal insisted on ouster of Prashant Bhushan, Yogendra Yadav from PACTimes of India 05.03.2015
NEW DELHI: AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal stamped his dominance over the party on Wednesday when two of his critics, Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav, were removed from the Political Affairs Committee, while his own offer of resignation as national convener of AAP was unanimously turned down.
While one chapter of the bitter feud in AAP might have ended now, it may not be the end of the story. The decision to remove Bhushan and Yadav wasn't unanimous - in fact, as many as eight voted against it while 11 voted for - indicating that there are a number of people in the PAC who share some of the concerns raised by the Bhushan-Yadav duo.
Kejriwal himself stayed away from the meeting, possibly because of his poor health (he went to Bangalore for naturopathy treatment of his very high sugar levels), but more likely to make the point that he was above the squabbling lot - in other words, truly the first among the so-called equals.
Kejriwal also avoided engaging with the Bhushan-Yadav duo on any of the issues raised by them. Even last night the duo, or one of them, is learnt to have sought a one-on-one meeting with Kejriwal but there was no response to the overture. At the end, he apparently insisted on their removal from the PAC as a precondition for his staying as the National Convener. A fresh letter of resignation as national convener on Wednesday morning only reiterated his firm stand.
Before Wednesday's PAC Meeting, there were serious efforts to sort to bring about a reconciliation between Kejriwal and the duo. Many options were considered, including one where the duo would offer some kind of apology. Most senior leaders found this reasonable as they also didn't want the party's unity to be affected in any way.
However, when the leaders reached Kejriwal, he insisted on the duo's removal from PAC, indicating a rather quick graduation of AAP to hard-nosed power politics. Sources said that while many recognized that the issues raised by the duo were important and needed to be addressed, their presence in the PAC was untenable after the recent war of words.
At the meeting, Bhushan and Yadav suggested that the PAC be reconstituted, allowing new members to come in. This was, however, opposed by the Kejriwal loyalists, who insisted on a resolution seeking the removal of the duo. The resolution was moved by deputy CM Manish Sisodia and put to vote and the duo lost 11-8. Interestingly, some senior AAP leaders like Anand Kumar, Ajit Jha, Rakesh Sinha voted against their removal while Mumbai's Mayank Gandhi and treasurer Krishnakant Sevada abstained.
Sources said that considering that the resolution was backed by Kejriwal it was a democratic process of open voting that was followed without fear of recrimination. Yadav was also removed as the party's chief spokesman.
Kejriwal loyalists criticised Bhushan and Yadav at the six-hour meeting for not showing confidence in the Delhi election team. They pointed out that this lack of confidence was despite the team crafting a stunning win for AAP in the election. The duo's continuing criticism of the team only showed that they were out of synch with the popular mood, the loyalists said. Bhushan and Yadav also raised the need for an internal ethics committee that had also been mentioned in their note.
"There is a huge trust deficit between the two groups and it will take a while for it to be bridged, if it is bridged at all. In the last few days a lot of things have been said which have left everyone with a bad taste in the mouth. There was criticism from both sides with very little middle ground," a senior leader said.
The removal of the Bhushan-Yadav duo was announced by Kumar Vishwas who said that the duo have been "freed" of their responsibilities in the PAC and would be given new responsibilities. The new responsibilities were, however, not spelt out. He said "personal opinions and personal differences" will not come in the way of the unity of the party, which will deliver on its promises and will not betray the trust of the people.
While there is an unmistakable sense of triumphalism in the Kejriwal camp, having removed the "two thorns", leaders and members close to the duo felt that Bhushan and Yadav's ouster from PAC only lent credence to their charge about the party being made into a "one-person" show.
Still, Yadav and Bhushan are unlikely to leave AAP. They are likely to raise the same issues at the meeting of the AAP National Council - an all-India body of leaders, members and volunteers - that is scheduled for the month-end. The duo believe, said sources close to them, that the broader body would be the right forum to test whether their misgivings was shared by AAP members or not, or was it just a Delhi-centric opposition to their criticism.
Speaking after the meeting Bhushan said, "The NE by majority decision decided that we should not remain the PAC. I hope that the party which was created and inspired millions of people as a party wedded to the principles of transparency, accountability, inner party democracy and Swaraj will not disappoint the people on whose efforts the party was founded.''
Yadav added that he would continue to work as a disciplined worker of the party. He added that the party was created with "blood and sweat" of thousands of supporters whose trust should not be betrayed.