It is unfortunate that verdict of voters in Delhi assembly
election is not clear in favour of any party due to multi- party contest . None
of political parties has got clear simple majority and as per norms defined in
the Constitution, none of them is in a position to form the government without
the support of other party and even if it is formed with the support of others,
there is no guarantee that the government will be able to last long and it will
be able to do business as per their manifesto or as per wishes of voters.
And if somehow or the other a cohesive group is formed media
will not hesitate in pulling the pent of leaders because it is media men who
are more negative minded than politicians of the country. Duty of the media is
not to do constructive job but only to criticize all those who are in the good
book of media promoters on genuine or flimsy ground. If BJP or AAP decides to
form the government with the support of AAP or BJP or Congress Party, they will
blame AAP or BJP of negotiating with the previous stand and if they do not form
the government they will accuse parties of wasting the money spent on conduct
of election and forcing the country to again spend good money on conduct of
fresh election.
Congress Party is silently watching the Draupdi Chirharan
sitting in AC room. After all who cares for common men?
However the era of
coalition government is not new and will not be abnormal and astonishing if the
similar hung verdict comes in forthcoming Lok Sabha election.
Media like to humiliate specially BJP both ways without
keeping in mind the interest of the common men. This is why politicians are
keeping away from forming the government. In such ego clash and mad diplomatic
stand of two or three political outfits as also due to sticking to six decade
old Constitutional provisions, common men are constrained to and are bound to suffer,
working of all offices will be adversely affected and in absence of stable government,
anti social elements will jeopardize the safety and security and also spoil the
economy from many considerations.
And last but not the least, avoidable
expenses on frequent elections, it is ultimately the common men who will have
to bear the brunt of tax load. Not only this , it is also bitter truth that in
case of multi -cornered contest, a person or a party getting 25% of votes or
seats get power whereas large chunk of persons and seats are opposed to persons
or party in power.
It is also a bitter but undeniable truth that due to misrule
of big national parties or due to some other reasons like caste and community
based policies of local and national leaders, many small parties at state level
have taken birth and slowly they are cutting the slice from national parties in
overall seat strength in state assemblies or in Parliament. Due to multi
cornered contest in general elections, votes are divided and wasted in many
small pockets and many such situations has arisen in the past in many states
and even in national election that none of contesting political party got the
majority. It is also true that national or regional parties managed majority by
compromising their own principles and formed the government. In many cases they
failed to perform due to inter party rivalries and inconsistencies in their
approaches that formed part of coalition government. . Even present UPA government
or previous NDA government was also formed after taking support of many small
parties. Nation has suffered a lot due to weak government at center or in
state.
There is no doubt that bipolar election or election between
two or three national parties may be good for the health of the country but great
advocate of democracy will perhaps not allow such thing to happen. And when
hung verdict merges in election results, some experts may suggest President’s
rules in Delhi but I am unable to understand what they will suggest when the
same hung verdict comes in forthcoming Parliamentary election.
Now since the era of multi parties has taken root a in all
states and at national level too, there is a immediate need to reinvent
Constitution to combat such critical situation.
IN case of Delhi, it is very much disheartening that neither
Aam Admi Party nor BJP is ready to form the government at Delhi and AAP has
even suggest second poll. Due to their own ego or due to constraints posed by
the constitutional provisions, they are suggesting second poll even if will
cause loss hundreds of crores of rupees. It is not their personal wealth which
is wasted in conduct of election.
Not only this, there is no guarantee that verdict of second
poll will give clear and simple majority to any political party. These parties
may suggest third poll or fourth poll without taking care of huge loss to the
country and huge manpower loss.
Such egoistic attitude or such blind worship to existing
provisions of the Constitution may prove dangerous.
It is important to say here that forthcoming national
election in 2014 may also not give clear verdict to any party due to increase
in power of various regional parties in various states. In such position there
is no provision of president’s rule and there will be compulsion for forming a
coalition government at center even if the coalition government will have to
sacrifice some of individual party manifestos.
Obviously advocates of democracy and Parliamentary democracy
will have to invent new methodology to run the government in case of hung
verdict either at state or at center level to save avoidable expenses on
recurrent election.Delhi election may be conducted in few hundred of crore of rupees but if fragmented result comes in Parliamentary election , expenses will be in thousands of crores in addition to loss of manpower time and energy.
IN such position I think
example of Delhi election verdict of hung assembly gives an opportunity
to all lovers of democracy to formulate new policy and new solution to meet
such critical situation and the same will be fruitful and money saver if the
verdict in 2014 parliamentary election also gives the similar fragmented verdict.
Time has come to accept the ground reality and define new
course of action now and now only. I condemn all those who are bent upon
spoiling the money and energy in frequent elections.
It will be very much praiseworthy that learned, talented and
intelligent members of AAP, BJP and Congress Party, constitutional experts,
advocates and all relevant persons and groups’ will sit together and decide new
path in the larger interest of the country.
I hope media men will stop Chirharan tactics and apply their
mind and energy to discover best ways to have stable and effective government
which will be for the people and without corruption. Century old Congress Party
should also refrain from divisive and anti national diplomacy to remain in power.
Country is already suffering from policy paralysis and administrative deficit ,
rulers should not add fuel to fire and save the country from vaccum of powerful
government .
09.12.2013
Following are some suggested lines to come out of the indecisiveness and uncertainty in Delhi Assembly and in formation of government in Delhi
I once again request pundits and
Constitutional experts to ponder over the crisis deeply and try to put forward
a solution in the light of changing situation when formation of coalition
government has more or less become inevitable. Country cannot afford election
after election to please political parties. After all it is wastage of public money.
It is also suggested to allow runners in the election to take part in passing
of bill to the extent which is needed for forming majority for number one party
in assembly election..
10.12.2013
09.12.2013
Following are some suggested lines to come out of the indecisiveness and uncertainty in Delhi Assembly and in formation of government in Delhi
Government may be formed jointly by
elected MLA of all parties in due proportion to their strength. After all it is
the duty of all MLAs to serve their constituencies. Traditionally MLAs of
opposition or non-ruling parties simply sit in the assembly and say YES or NO
as per advice of their High command. On the other hand MLA of ruling party
spend in their constituencies as per their wishes and use
government fund without any check point. Members of opposition parties used to
oppose only and that of ruling parties used to support blindly without going into
pros and cons of the bill.Members of ruling or that of opposing party had no option to express their opinion candidly on any bill.This sheep culture has become killer of democratic principles.
This tradition of saying yes and no as per dictates of Party high command is clearly not in unison with the real spirit of democracy and hence totally unjustified.
As such if all MLAs come together and take part in formation of the government, any bill can be passed on the basis of merit and demerit of the bill. Even MLA of any party (none is ruling and none is opposing) who were hitherto saying Yes or NO as per dictates of High Command may register their views and opinion in favour of or against a bill contrary to prevalent practice. A Member will be real independent of party line on any bill in new set up as defined above. This will give new life to democracy and I think democracy will function in true sense. All decisions will be taken by majority of members without any prefix of ruling or opposing group.
As such if all MLAs come together and take part in formation of the government, any bill can be passed on the basis of merit and demerit of the bill. Even MLA of any party (none is ruling and none is opposing) who were hitherto saying Yes or NO as per dictates of High Command may register their views and opinion in favour of or against a bill contrary to prevalent practice. A Member will be real independent of party line on any bill in new set up as defined above. This will give new life to democracy and I think democracy will function in true sense. All decisions will be taken by majority of members without any prefix of ruling or opposing group.
Rigidity of AAP not to join with BJP
or Congress Party is directly humiliation to elected members and similarly stands
of BJP and Congress not to join with each other or with AAP is totally against
the wishes of voters. AAP should keep in mind that they have 28 members and
there are 42 members against them. Similarly BJP has 32 members but 38 are
against them. In such position it is not good to give entire power to any group
of 35 and leave rest of MLAs on the mercy of GOD. All MLAs are duly elected by
democratic principles and all needs to be treat uniformly. For this purpose,
parties should suggest to amend Constitution.
In forthcoming Parliamentary
election, result may be more fragmented due to multi -party contest. Numbers of
regional parties are increasing year after year. These smaller groups will get
10 to 50 seats and blackmail with national bigger parties. As such Delhi
experiment will pave the way to invest suitable solution for Hung Parliament in
2014.
10.12.2013
Delhi Assembly Election
Result 2013 Constituency Wise.
Assembly
|
AC. No
|
Winner Name
|
Party
|
Vote
|
Runner UP
|
Party
|
Vote
|
Margin
|
ADARSH NAGAR
|
4
|
RAM KISHAN SINGHAL
|
INC
|
36985
|
JAGDEEP RANA
|
AAP
|
26929
|
10056
|
AMBEDKAR NAGAR
|
48
|
ASHOK KUMAR
|
AAP
|
36239
|
KHUSHI RAM CHUNAR
|
INC
|
24569
|
11670
|
BABARPUR
|
67
|
NARESH GAUR
|
BJP
|
34180
|
ZAKIR KHAN
|
IND
|
29673
|
4507
|
BADARPUR
|
53
|
RAMBIR SINGH BIDHURI
|
BJP
|
45344
|
RAM SINGH NETAJI
|
INC
|
31490
|
13854
|
BADLI
|
5
|
DEVENDER YADAV
|
Ind
|
54372
|
VIJAY KUMAR BHAGAT
|
BJP
|
31263
|
23109
|
BALLIMARAN
|
22
|
HAROON YUSUF
|
INC
|
32105
|
MOTI LAL SODHI
|
BJP
|
24012
|
8093
|
BAWANA
|
7
|
GUGAN SINGH
|
BJP
|
68407
|
MANOJ
|
AAP
|
42768
|
25639
|
BIJWASAN
|
36
|
SAT PRAKASH RANA
|
BJP
|
35988
|
DEVINDER KUMAR
SEHRAWAT
|
AAP
|
33574
|
2414
|
BURARI
|
2
|
SANJEEV JHA
|
AAP
|
60164
|
SHRI KRISHAN
|
BJP
|
49813
|
10351
|
CHANDNI CHOWK
|
20
|
PARLAD SINGH SAWHNEY
|
INC
|
26335
|
SUMAN KUMAR GUPTA
|
BJP
|
18092
|
8243
|
CHHATARPUR
|
46
|
BRAHM SINGH TANWAR
|
BJP
|
49975
|
BALRAM TANWAR
|
INC
|
33851
|
16124
|
DELHI CANTT
|
38
|
SURENDER SINGH
|
AAP
|
26124
|
KARAN SINGH TANWAR
|
BJP
|
25769
|
355
|
DEOLI
|
47
|
PRAKASH
|
AAP
|
51646
|
GAGAN RANA @ GAGAN
SHRI LAL PRADHAN
|
BJP
|
34538
|
17108
|
DWARKA
|
33
|
PARDUYMN RAJPUT
|
BJP
|
42734
|
RAVI KUMAR SURYAN
|
AAP
|
37537
|
5197
|
GANDHI NAGAR
|
61
|
ARVINDER SINGH
LOVELY
|
INC
|
48897
|
RAMESH CHAND JAIN
|
BJP
|
31936
|
16961
|
GHONDA
|
66
|
SAHAB SINGH CHAUHAN
|
BJP
|
47531
|
BHISHAM SHARMA
|
INC
|
35599
|
11932
|
GOKALPUR
|
68
|
RANJEET SINGH
|
BJP
|
34888
|
SURENDRA KUMAR
|
IND
|
32966
|
1922
|
GREATER KAILASH
|
50
|
SAURABH BHARADWAJ
|
AAP
|
43097
|
AJAY KUMAR MALHOTRA
|
BJP
|
30005
|
13092
|
HARI NAGAR
|
28
|
JAGDEEP SINGH
|
AAP
|
38912
|
SHYAM SHARMA
|
SAD
|
30036
|
8876
|
JANAKPURI
|
30
|
PROF. JAGDISH MUKHI
|
BJP
|
42886
|
RAJESH RISHI
|
AAP
|
40242
|
2644
|
JANGPURA
|
41
|
MANINDER SINGH DHIR
|
AAP
|
29701
|
TARVINDER SINGH
MARWAH
|
INC
|
27957
|
1744
|
KALKAJI
|
51
|
HARMEET SINGH
|
BJP
|
30683
|
DHARAMBIR SINGH
|
AAP
|
28639
|
2044
|
KARAWAL NAGAR
|
70
|
MOHAN SINGH BISHT
|
BJP
|
49262
|
KAPIL MISHRA
|
AAP
|
46179
|
3083
|
KAROL BAGH
|
23
|
VISHESH RAVI
|
AAP
|
35818
|
SURENDER PAL RATAWAL
|
BJP
|
34068
|
1750
|
KASTURBA NAGAR
|
42
|
MADAN LAL
|
AAP
|
33609
|
SHIKHA ROY
|
BJP
|
28935
|
4674
|
KIRARI
|
9
|
ANIL JHA
|
BJP
|
72283
|
RAJAN PRAKASH
|
AAP
|
23757
|
48526
|
KONDLI
|
56
|
MANOJ KUMAR
|
AAP
|
36863
|
DUSHYANT KUMAR
GAUTAM
|
BJP
|
29373
|
7490
|
KRISHNA NAGAR
|
60
|
DR. HARSH VARDHAN
|
BJP
|
69222
|
DR VINOD KUMAR MONGA
|
INC
|
26072
|
43150
|
LAXMI NAGAR
|
58
|
VINOD KUMAR BINNY
|
AAP
|
43052
|
ASHOK KUMAR WALIA
|
INC
|
35300
|
7752
|
MADIPUR
|
26
|
GIRISH SONI
|
AAP
|
36393
|
KAILASH SANKLA
|
BJP
|
35290
|
1103
|
MALVIYA NAGAR
|
43
|
SHRI SOMNATH BHARTI
|
AAP
|
32258
|
MS. ARTI MEHRA
|
BJP
|
24486
|
7772
|
MANGOL PURI
|
12
|
RAKHI BIRLA
|
AAP
|
44383
|
RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN
|
INC
|
33798
|
10585
|
MATIA MAHAL
|
21
|
SHOAIB IQBAL
|
JD(U)
|
22732
|
MIRZA JAVED ALI
|
INC
|
19841
|
2891
|
MATIALA
|
34
|
RAJESH GAHLOT
|
BJP
|
70053
|
GULAB SINGH
|
AAP
|
66051
|
4002
|
MEHRAULI
|
45
|
PARVESH SAHIB SINGH
|
BJP
|
37481
|
NARINDER SINGH
SEJWAL
|
AAP
|
32917
|
4564
|
MODEL TOWN
|
18
|
AKHILESH PATI
TRIPATHI
|
AAP
|
38492
|
ASHOK GOEL
|
BJP
|
30617
|
7875
|
MOTI NAGAR
|
25
|
SUBHASH SACHDEVA
|
BJP
|
42599
|
KULDEEP SINGH CHANNA
|
AAP
|
26578
|
16021
|
MUNDKA
|
8
|
RAMBIR SHOKEEN
|
IND
|
52564
|
AZAD SINGH
|
BJP
|
45430
|
7134
|
MUSTAFABAD
|
69
|
HASAN AHMED
|
INC
|
56250
|
JAGDISH PRADHAN
|
BJP
|
54354
|
1896
|
NAJAFGARH
|
35
|
AJEET SINGH
KHARKHARI
|
BJP
|
54358
|
BHARAT SINGH
|
IND
|
44590
|
9768
|
NANGLOI JAT
|
11
|
MANOJ KUMAR SHOKEEN
|
BJP
|
57449
|
DR. BIJENDER SINGH
|
INC
|
46434
|
11015
|
NERELA
|
1
|
NEEL DAMAN KHATRI
|
BJP
|
54622
|
VIRENDER
|
BSP
|
31077
|
23545
|
NEW DELHI
|
40
|
ARVIND KEJRIWAL
|
AAP
|
44269
|
SHEILA DIKSHIT
|
INC
|
18405
|
25864
|
OKHLA
|
54
|
ASIF MOHD KHAN
|
INC
|
50004
|
IRFANULLAH KHAN
|
AAP
|
23459
|
26545
|
PALAM
|
37
|
DHARM DEV SOLANKI
|
BJP
|
42833
|
BHAVNA GAUR
|
AAP
|
34461
|
8372
|
PATEL NAGAR
|
24
|
VEENA ANAND
|
AAP
|
38899
|
POORNIMA VIDYARTHI
|
BJP
|
32637
|
6262
|
PATPARGANJ
|
57
|
MANISH SISODIA
|
AAP
|
50211
|
NAKUL BHARDWAJ
|
BJP
|
38735
|
11476
|
R K PURAM
|
44
|
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA
|
BJP
|
28017
|
SHAZIA ILMI MALIK
|
AAP
|
27691
|
326
|
RAJINDER NAGAR
|
39
|
R.P.SINGH
|
BJP
|
35713
|
VIJENDER GARG VIJAY
|
AAP
|
33917
|
1796
|
RAJOURI GARDEN
|
27
|
MANJINDER SINGH
SIRSA
|
SAD
|
41721
|
A DHANWATI CHANDELA
A
|
INC
|
30713
|
11008
|
RITHALA
|
6
|
KULWANT RANA
|
BJP
|
73961
|
HARISH AWASTHI
|
AAP
|
48135
|
25826
|
ROHINI
|
13
|
RAJESH GARG
|
AAP
|
47890
|
JAI BHAGWAN AGGARWAL
|
BJP
|
46018
|
1872
|
ROHTAS NAGAR
|
64
|
JITENDER KUMAR
|
BJP
|
49916
|
MUKESH HOODA
|
AAP
|
34973
|
14943
|
SADAR BAZAR
|
19
|
SOM DUTT
|
AAP
|
34079
|
JAI PARKASH
|
BJP
|
33283
|
796
|
SANGAM VIHAR
|
49
|
DINESH MOHANIYA
|
AAP
|
24851
|
SHIV CHARAN LAL
GUPTA
|
BJP
|
24074
|
777
|
SEELAMPUR
|
65
|
CHAUDHARY MATEEN
AHMAD
|
INC
|
46452
|
KAUSHAL KUMAR MISHRA
|
BJP
|
24724
|
21728
|
SEEMA PURI
|
63
|
DHARMENDER SINGH
|
AAP
|
43199
|
VEER SINGH DHINGAN
|
INC
|
31223
|
11976
|
SHAHDARA
|
62
|
JITENDER SINGH
SHUNTY
|
BJP
|
45364
|
NARENDER NATH
|
INC
|
30247
|
15117
|
SHAKUR BASTI
|
15
|
SATYENDER KUMAR JAIN
|
AAP
|
40232
|
SHYAM LAL GARG
|
BJP
|
33170
|
7062
|
SHALIMAR BAGH
|
14
|
BANDANA KUMARI
|
AAP
|
47235
|
RAVINDER NATH BANSAL
|
BJP
|
36584
|
10651
|
SULTANPUR MAJRA
|
10
|
JAI KISHAN
|
INC
|
31458
|
SANDEEP KUMAR
|
AAP
|
30346
|
1112
|
TILAK NAGAR
|
29
|
JARNAIL SINGH
|
AAP
|
34493
|
RAJIV BABBER
|
BJP
|
32405
|
2088
|
TIMARPUR
|
3
|
HARISH KHANNA
|
AAP
|
39650
|
RAJNI ABBI
|
BJP
|
36267
|
3383
|
TRI NAGAR
|
16
|
NAND KISHORE GARG
|
BJP
|
36970
|
JITENDER SINGH TOMAR
|
AAP
|
34161
|
2809
|
TRILOKPURI
|
55
|
RAJU
|
AAP
|
44082
|
SUNIL KUMAR
|
BJP
|
26397
|
17685
|
TUGHLAKABAD
|
52
|
RAMESH BIDHURI
|
BJP
|
34009
|
SAHI RAM
|
BSP
|
28063
|
5946
|
UTTAM NAGAR
|
32
|
PAWAN SHARMA
|
BJP
|
48377
|
MUKESH SHARMA
|
INC
|
42031
|
6346
|
VIKASPURI
|
31
|
MAHINDER YADAV
|
AAP
|
62032
|
KRISHAN GAHLOT
|
BJP
|
61627
|
405
|
VISHWAS NAGAR
|
59
|
OM PRAKASH SHARMA
|
BJP
|
44801
|
NASEEB SINGH
|
INC
|
37002
|
7799
|
WAZIRPUR
|
17
|
DR MAHANDER NAGPAL
|
BJP
|
37306
|
PRAVEEN KUMAR
|
AAP
|
31732
|
5574
|
AAP should understand the politics of leadership and power
If the BJP or the Congress suggest something sensible in the Lok Sabha, it remains to be seen if AAP will suppport it or oppose it---Business Standard ---11.12.2013
You have a home, a family, children. You're the king of the castle, you take all the decisions, people in your home believe you are fair, honest, equitable and understanding and compassionate. You have power.
Then your father comes to live with you. Adjustments have to be made. He has his own way of doing things. He's made you what you are, watched you grow, instilled values in you: some, like caste, that you may consider irrelevant in your current circumstances. But a little of the power has to be yielded out of respect. Space has to be made for the ideas he believes in. After all, he may be old-fashioned but that doesn't mean he's diluted his values.
Suddenly you find a child doesn't agree with you and sides with him.
Your father wants to be accepted in your family. He is hurt: till yesterday, he was the boss, he spoke up for you. Now you want to cast him aside and do things the way you think they should be done. You are terrified power will slip out of your hands. You are afraid your children will be out of sync with the reality today if you let your father influence them too much. If the pond is dirty, the fish will be dirty too. But that is the pond, that is society and you can only hope that if you protect your children against evil influences, they will still shine like beacons of purity and light because of what you've taught them, that the influence of your father or anyone else will not be regressive.
That is the politics of leadership and power.
The person who understood this best was Mahatma Gandhi. If he cooperated with India's oppressors, the British at one stage, it was because at that time, that was the right thing to do, bargaining for a better deal for his supporters and his people, while constantly striving to be one of them, from the frugal diet to the loincloth, a lifestyle that everyone identified with. There was no one who was more conscious of the power he had than Gandhi. But he had a Plan about what to do with it.
Isn't politics about when to give up power and when to use it ? Arvind Kejriwal has abdicated power – either he wants absolute power or he wants none of it. He says everyone is corrupt and till the jhadu is allowed to clean, he will not side with anyone. At the same time, there is talk of contesting 70 Lok Sabha seats.
What happens then? If the BJP or the Congress suggest something sensible in the Lok Sabha, will the AAP suppport it or oppose it ? What will they support and what will they oppose ? Or will they just stay out of Parliament until they have the numbers to do what they think is right – whatever that might be ?
It is all very confusing. You can see what AAP doesn't want – but you are not clear what it is they want and how they're going to go about achieving it.
Then your father comes to live with you. Adjustments have to be made. He has his own way of doing things. He's made you what you are, watched you grow, instilled values in you: some, like caste, that you may consider irrelevant in your current circumstances. But a little of the power has to be yielded out of respect. Space has to be made for the ideas he believes in. After all, he may be old-fashioned but that doesn't mean he's diluted his values.
Suddenly you find a child doesn't agree with you and sides with him.
Your father wants to be accepted in your family. He is hurt: till yesterday, he was the boss, he spoke up for you. Now you want to cast him aside and do things the way you think they should be done. You are terrified power will slip out of your hands. You are afraid your children will be out of sync with the reality today if you let your father influence them too much. If the pond is dirty, the fish will be dirty too. But that is the pond, that is society and you can only hope that if you protect your children against evil influences, they will still shine like beacons of purity and light because of what you've taught them, that the influence of your father or anyone else will not be regressive.
That is the politics of leadership and power.
The person who understood this best was Mahatma Gandhi. If he cooperated with India's oppressors, the British at one stage, it was because at that time, that was the right thing to do, bargaining for a better deal for his supporters and his people, while constantly striving to be one of them, from the frugal diet to the loincloth, a lifestyle that everyone identified with. There was no one who was more conscious of the power he had than Gandhi. But he had a Plan about what to do with it.
Isn't politics about when to give up power and when to use it ? Arvind Kejriwal has abdicated power – either he wants absolute power or he wants none of it. He says everyone is corrupt and till the jhadu is allowed to clean, he will not side with anyone. At the same time, there is talk of contesting 70 Lok Sabha seats.
What happens then? If the BJP or the Congress suggest something sensible in the Lok Sabha, will the AAP suppport it or oppose it ? What will they support and what will they oppose ? Or will they just stay out of Parliament until they have the numbers to do what they think is right – whatever that might be ?
It is all very confusing. You can see what AAP doesn't want – but you are not clear what it is they want and how they're going to go about achieving it.
No comments:
Post a Comment